Accreditation Standards
Master technical standard defining the competence, governance and operational criteria assessed during AIAC accreditation. Aligned with ISO/IEC 17011:2017.
AIAC publishes the standards, policies and procedures that govern how institutions are assessed, recognised, monitored and — where necessary — challenged. Transparency is a precondition of authority.
Each document below is version-controlled, publicly summarised, and available in full to accredited entities and regulators. Use the reference code when corresponding with the registry.
Master technical standard defining the competence, governance and operational criteria assessed during AIAC accreditation. Aligned with ISO/IEC 17011:2017.
Institutional governance principles applied to accredited entities: board independence, separation of duties, fiduciary controls and conflict-of-interest policies.
Anti-money-laundering and counter-financing-of-terrorism methodology applied at onboarding and continuous monitoring. Referenced against FATF 40 Recommendations.
Quantitative and qualitative risk-scoring approach used by AIAC assessment teams across jurisdiction, sector, governance and financial-integrity dimensions.
Continuous-monitoring obligations, attestation cycle, material-event reporting and conditions under which accreditation may be suspended or withdrawn.
Formal route for an applicant or accredited entity to challenge an accreditation decision before an independent appeals panel within 30 days.
Third-party route to lodge a complaint regarding the conduct of an accredited entity or the integrity of an AIAC assessment process.
Independence is not a slogan — it is a documented operating model. The Trust Center exists so any counterparty, regulator or accredited entity can audit the basis of our decisions.
All frameworks governing AIAC decisions are published and version-controlled.
Accreditation decisions are reviewable by a panel structurally separate from the assessment team.
Risk and compliance scores follow documented rubrics — not subjective discretion.
Material changes to standards are issued for public comment before adoption.
Controlled documents are released under a recipient register to maintain version traceability. The standards office responds within two working days.